The Oneiric-Technical Chiasm

A Phenomenological Account of VR Embodiment

Authors

  • Giulia Andreini IULM University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15160/2282-5460/2839

Keywords:

Dream, Virtual Reality, Embodiment, Phenomenology, Ego-splitting

Abstract

VR systems have often been accused of reinforcing «the rationalist dream of the disembodied mind, part of the long Western tradition of body denial» (Penny, 1994). Such a perspective precisely insists on the constitutive disembodiment of VR experience. Similarly, imagination and, even more radically, dreams have often been dismissed as disembodied experiences, even within the phenomenological tradition. Against this assumption and based on a confrontation with recent accounts of dreaming (Windt 2015) and VR experiences (Besmer 2015; Buongiorno 2019; Heft 2023), the paper argues for the embodied character of both experiences. Drawing on Husserl’s notion of Ichspaltung and Maurice Merleau-Ponty’s insights on body-schema plasticity (2012; 2020), the contribution delves deeper into the peculiar modes of embodiment prompted by these experiences, uncovering unprecedented analogies. Considering the long-standing link between dreams and media (Morin 2005; Grossi 2021), the paper proposes to understand it as a chiasm, and as a theme accommodating multiple variations, not least that introduced by VR.

References

Andreini, G. (2021). Corpo onirico e onirismo del corpo. Verso una filosofia dell’appartenenza nell’ultimo Merleau-Ponty. In Circolo, 11, 83-105 (https://www.incircolorivistafilosofica.it/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/InCircolo-n.11-6-Andreini.pdf).

Andreini, G. (2022). Du rêve comme passivité: Merleau-Ponty entre Sartre et Binswanger. Chiasmi International, 23, 187-202 (https://doi.org/10.5840/chiasmi20212326).

Balsamo, A. (1996). Technologies of the Gendered Body: Reading Cyborg Women. Durham & London: Duke University Press.

Baudry, J.-L. (1986). The Apparatus: Metapsychological Approaches to the Impression of Reality in Cinema. In P. Rosen (Ed.), Narrative, Apparatus, Ideology: A Film Theory Reader (299-318). New York: Columbia University Press.

Bédard, P. (2023). Virtuality+: The Physical Body in Virtual Reality and the Path Toward Augmented Virtuality. Aisthesis. Pratiche, linguaggi e saperi dell’estetico, 16 (1), 61-72 (https://doi.org/10.36253/Aisthesis-13949).

Besmer, K. M. (2015). What Robotic Re-Embodiment Reveals About Virtual Re-Embodiment. In R. Rosenberger & P.-P. Verbeek (Eds.), Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations (61-71). Lahman: Lexington Books.

Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Buongiorno, F. (2019). Embodiment, Disembodiment and Re-Embodiment in the Construction of the Digital Self. Humana.Mente Journal of Philosophical Studies, 36, 310-330 (https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/290/261).

Carbone, M. (2019). Philosophy‑Screens: From Cinema to the Digital Revolution. Engl. Trans. M. Nijhuis. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.

Cavallaro, M. (2017). The Phenomenon of Ego‑Splitting in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Pure Phantasy. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 48 (2), 162-177 (https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2016.1250436).

Conrad, Th. (1968). Zur Wesenlehre des psychischen Lebens und Erlebens. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.

De Preester, H. (2011). Technology and the Body: The (Im)Possibilities of Re‑Embodiment. Foundations of Science, 16, 119-137 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-010-9188-5).

de Warren, N. (2009). Imagination et incarnation. Methodos, 9, 1-16 (https://doi.org/10.4000/methodos.2148).

de Warren, (2014). Towards a Phenomenological Analysis of Virtual Fictions. Metodo. International Studies in Phenomenology and Philosophy, 2 (2), 91-112 (https://doi.org/10.19079/metodo.2.2.90).

Dourish, P. (2001). Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Du Toit, J. & Swer, G. (2021). Virtual Limitations of the Flesh: Merleau-Ponty and the Phenomenology of Technological Determinism. Phenomenology and Mind, 20, 20-31 (https://doi.org/10.17454/pam-2002).

Dufourcq, A. (2024). Merleau‑Ponty: An Ontology of the Imaginary. Engl. Trans. B. Smyth. Dordrecht: Springer.

Geniusas, S. (2022). What is Immersion? Towards a Phenomenology of Virtual Reality. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 53 (1), 1-24 (https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-20221396).

Grau, O. (2003). Virtual Art. From Illusion to Immersion. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Grossi, G. (2021). La notte dei simulacri. Sogno, cinema e realtà virtuale. Monza: Johan & Levy.

Hansen, M. B. N. (2006). Bodies in Code: Interfaces with Digital Media. New York & London: Routledge.

Hayles, N. K. (1999). How we Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

Heft, P. (2023). Virtual Embodiment or: When I Enter Cyberspace, What Body Will I Inhabit? Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 19 (1), 193-211 (https://cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/article/view/1065/1718).

Heim, M. (1993). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hobson, J. A. (1997). The Brain as a Dream State Generator: An Activation‑Synthesis Hypothesis of the Dream Process. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 134 (12), 1335-1348 (https://doi:10.1176/ajp.134.12.1335).

Huhtamo, E. (1995). Encapsulated Bodies in Motion: Simulators and the Quest for Total Immersion. In S. Penny (Ed.), Critical Issues in Electronic Media (159-186). Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.

Husserl, E. (1973). Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität: Texte aus dem Nachlass. Erster Teil: 1905–1920, hrsg. von I. Kern. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, E (1994). Briefwechsel Band III, Teil III. Die Göttinger Schule, hrsg. von S. Ijsseling. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Husserl, E. (2005). Phantasy, Image Consciousness, and Memory (1898–1925). Engl- Trans. J. B. Brough. Dordrecht: Springer.

Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Bloomington (IN) & Cambridge (MA): Indiana University Press.

Incao, S. & Mazzola, C. (2021). The Paradox of Virtual Embodiment: The Body Schema in Virtual Reality Aesthetic Experience. Studia Universitatis Babeș‑Bolyai – Philosophia, 66 (2, Suppl.), 131-139 (https://doi.org/10.24193/SUBBPHIL.2021.2S.09).

Kilteni, K., Groten, R., & Slater, M. (2012). The Sense of Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments, 21 (4), 373-387.

Klevjer, R. (2012). Enter the Avatar: The Phenomenology of Prosthetic Telepresence in Computer Games. In J. R. Sageng, H. Fossheim, T. M. Larsen (Eds.), The Philosophy of Computer Games (17-38). Dordrecht: Springer.

Manovich, L. (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

Merleau‑Ponty, M. (1968). The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes. Engl. Trans. A. Lingis. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press.

Merleau‑Ponty, M. (2003). Nature: Course Notes from the Collège de France. Engl. Trans. R. Vallie. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press.

Merleau‑Ponty, M. (2010). Institution and Passivity: Course Notes from the Collège de France (1954–1955). Engl Trans. L. Lawlor & H. Massey. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press.

Merleau‑Ponty, M. (2012). Phenomenology of Perception. Engl. Trans. D. A. Landes. New York: Routledge.

Merleau-Ponty, M. (2020). The Sensible World and the World of Expression: Course Notes from the Collège de France. Engl. Trans. B. Smyth. Evanston (IL): Northwestern University Press.

Metzinger, Th. (2003). Being No One: The Self‑Model Theory of Subjectivity. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

Metzinger, Th. (2009). The Ego Tunnel: The Science of Mind and the Myth of the Self. New York (NY): Basic Books.

Morin, E. (2005). The Cinema, or The Imaginary Man. Engl. Trans. L. Mortimer. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press.

Morley, J. (1999). The Sleeping Subject: Merleau‑Ponty on Dreaming. Theory & Psychology, 9 (1), 89–101.

Pinotti, A. (2020). Towards An‑Iconology: The Image as Environment. Screen, 61 (4), 594-603 (https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjaa060).

Revonsuo, A. (2005). The Self in Dreams. In T. E. Feinberg & J. P. Keenan (Eds.), The Lost Self: Pathologies of the Brain and Identity (206-219). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Richir, M. (2000). Phénoménologie en esquisses: Nouvelles fondations. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.

Richir, M. (2004). Phantasia, imagination, affectivité: phénoménologie et anthropologie phénoménologique. Grenoble: Jérôme Millon.

Sartre, J.‑P. (2004). The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Engl. Trans. J. Webber. London & New York: Routledge.

Schatzberg, E. (2018). Technology. Critical History of a Concept. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.

Slater, M., & Perez‑Marcos, D., et al. (2009). Inducing Illusory Ownership of a Virtual Body. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3 (2), 214-220 (https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.029.2009).

Steeves, J. B. (2004). Imagining Bodies: Merleau‑Ponty’s Philosophy of Imagination. Pittsburgh (PA): Duquesne University Press.

Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2014). Distributed Embodiment: Real Presence in Virtual Bodies. In M. Grimshaw‑Aagaard (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Virtuality (589-601). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Windt, J. M. (2015). Dreaming: A Conceptual Framework for Philosophy of Mind and Empirical Research. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-01