Capturing the Sun
Solarpunk and the Elite Capture of Imagination
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15160/2282-5460/2928Parole chiave:
Imagination, Capability, Elite Capture, SolarpunkAbstract
The climate emergencies of the last few years are making increasingly clear that unless the destructive and exploitative structures that support modern standards of living are dismantled and transformed, the future shall be a very hot and desolate one. Science fiction has offered a venue to reflect and envision possible futures in ways that engage our imagination and stimulate technological innovation. We argue that imagination can be understood as a collective capability that supports forms of resistance and resilience. This framing enables us to examine the consequence of the existence of power asymmetries, which may distort the potential of imagination to be a source of transformative change. To make our case, we reflect on solarpunk as a contemporary art and activism movement that envisions hopeful futures of ecological living. We argue that, as a subversive imaginary, solarpunk may be affected by processes of elite capture that could stifle its radical potential, particularly in relation to its visual identity. By reflecting on two emblematic cases, we illustrate how imagination can be captured in ways that damage its political potential. Our contribution shows that even well-intentioned or apparently innocuous uses of forms of imagination and imaginaries can have reactionary political consequences that normalize and neutralize narratives in support of radical change. Analyzing the risk of capture of sustainable future imaginaries such as solarpunk is relevant for the study of the multiple narratives, visual, literary, and academic, that are at play in public debates on the sustainability transition and climate change mitigation and adaptation, and their political consequences.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Asafu-Adjaye, J. et al. (2015). An Ecomodernist Manifesto (https://www.ecomodernism.org/manifesto-english).
Balkan, S. (2024). Electric Ladyland: Anticolonial Solarpunk as Infrastructural Re-sistance in Two Works of Speculative Fiction. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Litera-ture and Environment, isae043 (https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isae043).
Benjamin, R. (2024). Imagination: A Manifesto. New York: W.W. Norton & Compa-ny.
Bianchi, J. (2023). Vanishing Tracks in the Sand. Engl. Trans. R. Amoruso. In F. Verso (ed.), The Bright Mirror: Women of Global Solarpunk (185-207). Rome: Future Fiction.
Bottici, C. (2014). Imaginal Politics: Images Beyond Imagination and the Imagi-nary. New York: Columbia University Press.
Collins, S. (2020). How Much Can We Ask of Collective Agents? Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 50 (7), 815-831 (https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2020.42).
Fisher, M. (2009). Capitalist Realism: Is There No Alternative? Winchester, UK: Zero Books.
Fletcher, N. M. (2016). Imagination and the Capabilities Approach. In A. Kind (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination (392-404). New York and Lon-don: Routledge.
Gerola, A., Robaey, Z. & Blok, V. (2023). What Does it Mean to Mimic Nature? A Typology for Biomimetic Design. Philosophy & Technology, 36, 65 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00665-0).
Ghosh, A. (2016). The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gillam, W. J. (2023). A Solarpunk Manifesto: Turning Imaginary into Reality. Philo-sophies, 8 (4), 73 (https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies8040073).
Goodbody, A. & Johns-Putra, A. (eds). (2019). Cli-Fi: A Companion. Oxford: Peter Lang.
Hudson, A. D. (2015). On the Political Dimensions of Solarpunk. Medium, Oct. 15, 2015 (https://medium.com/solarpunks/on-the-political-dimensions-of-solarpunk-c5a7b4bf8df4).
Hunting, E. (2020). Solarpunk: Post-Industrial Design and Aesthetics. Medium. (https://medium.com/@erichunting/solarpunk-post-industrial-design-and-aesthetics-1ecb350c28b6).
Illich, I. (1975). Tools for Conviviality. Glasgow: Fontana.
Jameson, F. (2007). Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and Oth-er Science Fictions. London: Verso Books.
Jasanoff, S. & Kim, S. (eds). (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Im-aginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson, M. (1993). Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Eth-ics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Kind, A. (2022). Fiction and the Cultivation of Imagination. In P. Engisch & J. Langkau (eds.), The Philosophy of Fiction: Imagination and Cognition (262-281). Lon-don and New York: Routledge.
Kind, A. (ed.). (2016). The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Imagination. Lon-don and New York: Routledge.
Kothari, A. et al. (eds). (2019). Pluriverse: A Post-Development Dictionary. New Delhi: Tulika Books.
Lang, M. et al. (2024). Lucrative Transitions, Green Colonialism and Pathways to Transformative Eco-social Justice: An Introduction. In M. Lang et al. (eds), The Geopoli-tics of Green Colonialism (1-24). London: Pluto Press.
Lodi-Ribeiro, G. (organizado por). (2012). Solarpunk. Histórias ecológicas e fantás-ticas em um mundo sustentável. São Paulo: Editora Draco.
MacKinnon, R. B. et al. (2020). Promises and Presuppositions of Biomimicry. Bio-mimetics, 5 (3), 33 (https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics5030033).
Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solu-tionism. New York: PublicAffairs.
Musgrave, M. K., & Wong, S. (2016). Towards a More Nuanced Theory of Elite Cap-ture in Development Projects. The Importance of Context and Theories of Power. Journal of Sustainable Development, 9 (3), 87-103 (http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v9n3p87).
Reina-Rozo, J. D. (2021). Art, Energy and Technology: the Solarpunk Movement. In-ternational Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, 8 (1), 47-60 (https://doi.org/10.24908/ijesjp.v8i1.14292).
Robaey, Z., & Hase Ueta, M. (2024). Imagination as a Collective Capability for Sustainability Transformations, 14th Braga Meetings on Ethics & Political Philosophy, (https://14bragameetings.weebly.com/uploads/1/5/4/2/15425470/book_of_abstracts_-_14th_braga_meetings.pdf).
Roos, A. & Hornborg, A. (2024). Technology as Capital: Challenging the Illusion of the Green Machine. Capitalism Nature Socialism, 35 (2), 75-95 (https://doi.org/10.1080/10455752.2024.2332218).
Rosignoli, F. (2018). Categorizing Collective Capabilities. Partecipazione e conflitto, 11 (3), 813-837 (https://doi.org/10.1285/i20356609v11i3p813).
Shapland, P. et al. (2021). How the Elite Capture Critique Is Used to Legitimise Top-down Control of Development Resources. In D. Ludwig et al. (eds), The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation (80-103). London and New York: Routledge.
Táíwò, O. O. (2022). Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (and Everything Else). London: Pluto Press.
Trexler, A. (2015). Anthropocene Fictions: The Novel in a Time of Climate Change. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press.
The Solarpunk Community (2019). A Solarpunk Manifesto. In Regenerative Design (https://www.re-des.org/es/a-solarpunk-manifesto/).
Verso, F. (2023). The Roamers, Engl. Trans. S. McCorry. New York: Simon and Schus-ter.
Verso, F. (2024). No/Mad/Land, Engl. Trans. S. McCorry. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Wilson, P. (2019). The Afronaut and Retrofuturism in Africa. ASAP/Journal, 4 (1), 139-166 (https://doi.org/10.1353/asa.2019.0016).
Web Resources
Ginko Bioworks, (2021). Solarpunk Puzzle. (https://www.growbyginkgo.com/products/solarpunk-puzzle/).
The Line Animation Studio. (2021). Dear Alice. (https://www.thelineanimation.com/work/chobani).
Downloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Alessio Gerola, Zoë Robaey
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.