Comic Ideas
Reimagining Philosophical Practice in the Digital Age
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15160/2282-5460/2946Parole chiave:
Comics, Visual Thinking, Screen, Media Philosophy, Word and ImageAbstract
The paper claims that our increasingly visual mediascape opens up the possibility of imagining new ways of doing philosophy that take place through the medium of image at least as much as through the medium of word. Section 1 introduces the general question of the change of habits associated with the transition from page/word to screen/image, challenging the traditional skepticism regarding the cognitive reliability of images. Section 2 discusses the limits of the idea that screens are unavoidably destined to have a lethal impact on philosophical thinking, emphasizing how this conviction risks excluding philosophy from the novel cognitive ecology cultivated by the internet. Section 3 examines the conditions of possibility of «comicepts» – philosophical concepts created and communicated by leveraging the specific features of comics as a medium. Section 4 concludes by making a plea for a more liberal and inclusive philosophical practice based on the decoupling of “concept” and “verbal concept”.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Agamben, G. (2017). The Fire and the Tale. Engl. Trans. L. Chiesa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Antinucci, F. (2011). Parola e immagine. Storia di due tecnologie. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Appiah, K. A. (2003). Thinking It Through: An Introduction to Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Blumenberg, H. (2010). Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Engl. Trans. R. Savage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Burnett, R. (2005). How Images Think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Calabrese, S. & Zagaglia, E. (2017). Che cos’è il graphic novel. Roma: Carocci.
Calabrese, S. et al. (2021). Elogio della visual literacy. Enthymema, XXVII, 90-113 (https://doi.org/10.13130/2037).
Calvino, I. (1988). Six Memos for the Next Millenium. Engl. Trans. P. Creagh. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Calvino, I. (1997). Philosophy and Literature. In The Literature Machine. Engl. Trans. P. Creagh (39-49). London: Vintage.
Camp, E. (2007). Thinking with Maps. Philosophical Perspectives, 21 (1), 145-182 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1520-8583.2007.00124.x).
Carbone, M. & Lingua, G. (2023). Toward an Anthropology of Screens: Showing and Hiding, Exposing and Protecting. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carr, N. (2020). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. New York: Atlantic Books.
Casati, R. (2013). Contre le colonialisme numérique. Manifeste pour continuer à lire. Paris: Albin Michel.
Clowes, R. W. (2019a). Screen Reading and the Creation of New Cognitive Ecologies. AI & Society, 34, 705-720 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0785-5).
Clowes, R. W. (2019b). Immaterial Engagement: Human Agency and the Cognitive Ecology of the Internet. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, 18 (1), 259-279 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9560-4).
Cohn, N. (2013). The Visual Language of Comics: Introduction to the Structure and Cognition of Sequential Images. London-New Delhi-New York-Sidney: Bloomsbury.
Cook, R. T. (2017). Metacomics. In F. Bramlett et al. (Eds.), The Routledge Companion to Comics (257-266). London and New York: Routledge.
Cowling, S. & Cray, W. D. (2022). Philosophy of Comics: An Introduction. London-New Delhi-New York-Sidney: Bloomsbury.
Danto, A. C. (1986). The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. New York: Columbia University Press.
Diamond, C. (1993). Martha Nussbaum and the Need for Novels. Philosophical Investigations, 16 (2), 128-153 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9205.1993.tb00456.x).
Drucker, J. (2020). Visualization and Interpretation: Humanistic Approaches to Display. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Eisenstein, L. (2005). The Printing Revolution in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eisner, W. (1990). Comics & Sequential Art. Tamarac: Poorhouse.
Ellul, J. (1981). La parole humiliée. Paris: Seuil.
Falzon, C. (2002). Philosophy Goes to the Movie: An Introduction to Philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
Fasoli, M. (2018). Super Artifacts: Personal Devices as Intrinsically Multifunctional, Meta-Representational Artifacts with a Highly Variable Structure. Minds and Machines, 28 (3), 589-604 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9476-3).
Floridi, L. (2017). Digital’s Cleaving Power and Its Consequences. Philosophy & Technology, 30 (3), 123-129 (https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0259-1).
Floridi, L. (2019). The Logic of Information. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Flusser, V. (1997). Medienkultur. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer.
Gaita, R. (2004). The Philosopher’s Dog. London and New York: Routledge.
Gannon, L. (2002). A Critique of Evolutionary Psychology. Psychology, Evolution & Gender, 4 (2), 173-218 (https://doi.org/10.1080/1461666031000063665).
Gazzaley, A. & Rosen, L. D. (2016). The Distracted Mind: Ancient Brains in a High-Tech World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Goody, J. (1977). The Domestication of the Savage Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goody, J. (1986). The Logic of Writing and the Organization of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Groensteen, T. (1999). Système de la bande dessinée. Paris: PUF.
Grønstad, A. & Vågnes, Ø. (2006). An Interview with W.J.T. Mitchell, Image & Narrative, 15 (https://www.imageandnarrative.be/inarchive/iconoclasm/gronstad_vagnes.htm).
Hague, I. (2014). Comics and the Senses: A Multisensory Approach to Comics and Graphic Novels. London and New York: Routledge.
Han, B.-C. (2023). Vita Contemplativa: In Praise of Inactivity. Engl. Trans. D. Steuer. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Harris, R. (2009). Rationality and the Literate Mind. London and New York: Routledge.
Hartmann, F. (2000). Medienphilosophie. Wien: WUV.
Havelock, E. A. (1986). The Muse Learns to Write: Reflections on Orality and Literacy from Antiquity to the Present. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Holbo, J. (2012). Redefining Comics. In A. Meskin & R.T. Cook (Eds), The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach (3-30). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hudson Hick, D. (2012). The Language of Comics. In A. Meskin & R.T. Cook (Eds.), The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach (125-144). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Huizinga, J. (1936). In the Shadow of Tomorrow: A Diagnosis of the Spiritual Ills of Our Time. New York: W.W. Norton.
Hummels, C. C. M. et al. (2022). Non-Discursive Philosophy by Imagining New Practices through Design. Adaptive Behavior, 30 (6), 537-540 (https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123211006463).
Illich, I. (1993). In the Vineyard of the Text: A Commentary to Hugh’s Didascalicon. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Jackson, M. (2008). Distracted: The Erosion of Attention and the Coming of the Dark Age. Amherst: Prometheus.
Jonas, H. (1962). Homo Pictor and the Differentia of Man. Social Research, 29 (2), 201-220.
Kittler, F. A. (2009). Towards an Ontology of Media. Theory, Culture & Society, 26 (2-3), 23-31 (https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409103106).
Kress, G. (2000). Design and Transformation: New Theories of Meaning. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures (153-161). London and New York: Routledge.
Livingston, P. (2006). Theses on Cinema as Philosophy. Journals of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 64 (1), 11-18 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2006.00225.x).
Malafouris, L. (2007). Before and Beyond Representation: Towards an Enactive Conception of the Palaeolithic Image. In C. Renfrew & M. Iain (Eds.), A Global Prehistory of Figurative Representation (287-302). Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research.
McClelland, T. (2019). Film as Philosophical Thought Experiment: Some Challenges and Opportunities. In C. Rawls, D. Neiva & S. S. Gouveia (Eds.), Philosophy and Film: Bridging Divides (92-115). London and New York: Routledge.
McCloud, S. (1994). Understanding Comics: The Invisible Art. New York: HarperPerennial.
McLaren, G. (2012). The Triumph of Virtual Reality and Its Implications for Philosophy and Civilization. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy, 8 (1), 383-411.
McLaughlin, J., ed. (2005). Comics as Philosophy. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.
McLaughlin, J., ed. (2017). Graphic Novels as Philosophy. Jackson: University of Mississippi Press.
Menary, R. (2007). Writing as Thinking. Language Sciences, 29 (5), 621-632 (https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.01.005).
Mendelsund, P. (2014). What We See When We Read. New York: Random House.
Meskin, A. (2009). Comics as Literature?. The British Journal of Aesthetics, 49 (3), 219-239 (https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp025).
Mirzoeff, N. (1998). What Is Visual Culture? In N. Mirzoeff (Ed.), The Visual Culture Reader (3-13). London and New York: Routledge.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1986). Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2014). Comics as Media: Afterword. Critical Inquiry, 40 (3), 255-265 (https://doi.org/10.1086/677376).
Mol, A. (2022). Material Philosophy and the Adaptability of Materials. Adaptive Behavior, 30 (6), 517-519 (https://doi.org/10.1177/1059712320984510).
Montani, P. (2020). The Imagination and Its Technological Destiny. Open Philosophy, 3 (1), 187-201 (https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0107).
Nilsson, J. A. (2024). Cinecepts, Deleuze, and Godard-Miéville: Developing Philosophy through Audiovisual Media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Nussbaum, M. C. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Olson, D. R. (1994). The World on Paper: The Conceptual and Cognitive Implications of Writing and Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Olson, D. R. (2017). The Mind on Paper: Reading, Consciousness and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ong, W. (1982). Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London and New York: Routledge.
Pasolini, P. P. (2005). The “Cinema of Poetry”. In Heretical Empiricism. Engl. Transl. B. Lawton, L. K. Barnett (176-186). Washington: New Academia.
Pezzano, G. (forthcoming). Playable Concepts? For a Critique of Videogame Reason. Open Philosophy.
Pezzano, G. & Gualeni, S. (2024). How to Do Philosophy with Sci-Fiction: A Case of Hybrid Textuality. Filosofia, 69, 251-266 (https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/11205).
Pezzano, G. et al. (2024). How to Do Concepts with Images: A Graphic Essay [Manuscript submitting for publication].
Postman, N. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business. New York: Viking.
Rietveld, E. (2022). The Affordance of Art for Making Technologies. Adaptive Behavior, 30 (6), 489-503 (https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221132898).
Rietveld, E., & Kiverstein, J. (2022). Reflections on the Genre of Philosophical Art Installations. Adaptive Behavior, 30 (6), 589-602 (https://doi.org/10.1177/10597123221133189).
Sanchez, C. A. (2011). Philosophy and Post-Immigrant Fear. Philosophy and the Contemporary World, 18 (1), 31-42 (https://doi.org/10.5840/pcw20111814).
Sartori, G. (1998). Homo videns. Televisione e post-pensiero. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Simondon, G. (2017). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Engl. Trans. C. Malaspina & J. Rogove. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Simone, R. (2000). La Terza Fase. Forme di sapere che stiamo perdendo. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
Sini, C. (2016). L’alfabeto e l’Occidente. Opere. III.1. Milano: Jaca Book.
Sloterdijk, P. (2012). The Art of Philosophy: Wisdom as a Practice. Engl. Trans. K. Margolis. New York: Columbia University Press.
Smith, M. (2006). Film Art, Argument, and Ambiguity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 64 (1), 33-42 (https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00227.x).
Sontag, S. (1973). On Photography. New York: RosettaBooks.
Sousanis, N. (2015). Unflattening. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Spitzer, M. (2012). Digitale Demenz. München: Droemer.
Stetter, C. (1999). Schrift und Sprache. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Türcke, C. (2012). Hyperaktiv! Kritik der Aufmerksamkeitsdefizitkultur. München: Beck.
Valéry, P. (1976). Philosophy of the Dance. Engl. Trans. M. L. Pops. Salmagundi, 33-34, 65-75.
Wartenberg, T. E. (2012). Wordy Pictures: Theorizing the Relationship between Image and Text in Comics. In A. Meskin & R.T. Cook (Eds.), The Art of Comics: A Philosophical Approach (87-104). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Wartenberg, T. E. (2023). Thoughtful Images: Illustrating Philosophy Through Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weigel, M. & Gardner, H. (2009). The Best of Both Literacies. Educational Leadership, 66 (6), 38–41.
Wertham, F. (1954). Seduction of the Innocent. New York: Rinehart & Company.
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. New York: HarperPerennial.
Wolf, M. (2018). Reader, Come Home: The Reading Brain in a Digital World. New York: HarperPerennial.
Downloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Giacomo Pezzano
Questo lavoro è fornito con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Non opere derivate 4.0 Internazionale.